The contract is either valid or void

 Mitchell, 

A cyber warrior with a peculiar personality mixed with idiosyncrasies that are quirky. This is not exaggerated by the nature of things. This guy is a cyber-criminal, induced on using technology to evade service of summons on a verified complaint for causes of actions that include but are not limited to infringement, copyright violations, repeated targeting and initiating false claims to federal agencies in an attempt to have my home "swatted.”

All he has to do is evade service. “The defendant is either guilty or not guilty.”: In criminal trials, this statement reflects the binary nature of verdicts. The defendant can only be found either guilty or not guilty; there is no third option. In civil litigation, it has zero effects.

“The law is what it is.”: This tautology emphasizes that the law exists independently of personal opinions or preferences. It reinforces the idea that legal rules are fixed and subjective as the objective. However, I learned that the rules by a pragmatic protagonist approach can be adjusted by the Judicial Court to suit the occasion and not necessarily stand by the decisions already decided.

“The contract is either valid or void.”: Contracts are either legally binding (valid) or unenforceable (void). There is no middle category.

“The evidence is either admissible or inadmissible.”: In court proceedings, evidence is evaluated based on its relevance and reliability. It is either allowed (admissible) or excluded (inadmissible).